In order to conclude that the Bible is true, doesn't a person need to start from the premise that the Bible is true?

There is no evidence to support any of the claims made in the Bible ... .. There is no evidence god doesn't exist, so belief is as justified or as valid as non-belief. ... .. An open-minded person is receptive to new ideas, opinions and arguments and wants to ... . can be constructed does not imply a true premise or true conclusion.

Some of his friends say the Bible isn't true, and he's not always sure how to respond. ... .. I mean for a start it was made up by man, not even God himself, therefore it is ... . I have always said "Better to believe in God and discover he doesn't exist than ... . Also, to the person who said about cell laws and to just f...

Socrates is a man. ... 1. if the premises were true, then the conclusion would have to be true as well. ... they imply that the premises must actually be true in order for the argument to be valid. ... . Just saying the conclusion over again doesn't do this. implicit: If the Bible says that God exists, then God exists...

(Again, we probably wouldn't normally give you an argument in order to ... The conclusion doesn't actually follow from the premises. It's not the case that if its premises were true, then its conclusion would have to be true. ... Suppose again that God does in fact exist, the Bible says this, and everything the Bible says is...

Needless to say, a lack of evidence against a claim doesn't make the ... Although the argument itself may be perfectly sound, it's no more or less true the ... A Christian might say, “People have believed in God for thousands of years. ... . They simply want you to accept the premise that they're similar and accept the concl...

Such 'reasoning' is bound to be flawed, because it starts with axioms ... People of the Spirit won't try to understand what's happening—they will ... Many non- Christians have a misconception of biblical faith, and ... . An invalid argument with a true premise and true conclusion is: ... .. 2) The moon dust argument doesn'...

The point of an argument is to give reasons in support of some conclusion. An argument commits ... Proof: the steps needed to prove that the fallacy is committed. ... Argue that it may be true even though we don't know whether it is or isn't. ... .. (Here, we must agree that God exists in order to believe that God wrote the Bibl...

Many times in the past, people have concluded that because something is ... There's one thing you can't do, though: start from true premises, proceed via ... "If the Bible is accurate, Jesus must either have been insane, a liar, or the Son of God." ... It doesn't state the premises necessary to support its conclusi...

A statement or proposition is something that can either be true or false. ... It's still an argument, and there are still premises and a conclusion, even if the ... A perfect being must have every trait or property that it's better to have than not to have. ... . that God exists in the Bible, and everything in the Bible is the tr...

Of course, one does not need to study logic in order to reason correctly; ... If something doesn't seem obvious to you, don't be afraid to question it. ... For example: "If the Bible is accurate, Jesus must either have been insane, an evil liar , ... More subtly, we can reach a true conclusion from one or more false premises...

Someone may argue: "That is the richest sorority on campus; so Sue, who belongs to that ... It doesn't matter whether the conclusion is true or not in the literal sense. ... No: The order could have some other origin. ... "If the God of the Bible appeared to me, personally, that would certainly prove that Christianity was ...

“”We agree that presuppositional apologetics is the ultimate biblical ... would not work if the conclusion wasn't already assumed to be true. ... Here, it is assumed that God exists in order to satisfy the premise that ... It's very simple to do, and doesn't always require someone running to a dictionary to ...